NHMRC $3.3 million on wind farm research – “money down the drain”?

Wind farm

The National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) has announced two grants totalling $3.3 million to researchers at the University of New South Wales and Flinders University to “enrich the evidence-based understanding of the effects of wind farms on human health”.

This is despite its own year-long study that reported in early 21015 that there was no “consistent evidence” that a problem exists.

The NHMRC made a targeted call for research last year, and has now named the recipients as Prof Guy Marks from UNSW ($1.94m) and Assoc Prof Peter Catcheside of Flinders University ($1.36m).

A statement from the NHMRC says that UNSW will “investigate the broader social and environmental circumstances that may influence the health of people living near wind farms”, studying the health impacts of infrasound – sound waves typically inaudible to humans – generated by wind turbines.

Flinders University will “explore relationships between noise from wind farms and effects such as annoyances and reduced sleep and quality of life”.

Simon Chapman, emeritus professor of public health at the University of Sydney and 2013 Skeptic of the Year, told the Sydney Morning Herald that “There had been at least 25 reviews internationally – including by the NHMRC – that showed very little evidence of direct effects from wind farms.”

Effects that did exist could be put down to psycho-social factors, he said, such as pre-existing antipathy to wind farms, resentment by locals who had received no benefit from turbines in their region, and anxiety of perceived health impacts.

“It’s really quite disgraceful; it’s money literally poured down the drain. There is no health or medical agency in the world that would give any rational priority to wind farms and health.

“Potentially hundreds of researchers who had just missed on funding research would be angry as the money is being spent on wind farm research.”

NHMRC CEO Prof Anne Kelso said that further research was needed to explore the relationships between wind farms and human health.

“Existing research in this area is of poor quality and targeted funding is warranted to support high quality, independent research on this issue.

“To address this, we need well-designed studies conducted by excellent researchers in Australian conditions. These grants directly support the Australian Government’s commitment to determine any actual or potential effects of wind farms,” she said.

“NHMRC supports only the most outstanding research. Each application for this funding underwent the same stringent independent review process we apply to all NHMRC grant applications.”

The Abbott government, and particularly former PM Tony Abbott and Treasurer Joe Hickey, were against wind farms on both supposed technical issues and aesthetic grounds.

The 2014/15 study by NHMRC was ordered by the Abbott government in January 2013, even before the results of a separate review of the issue by the council had been made public. The decision for another review stoked fears that the government was being swayed by anti-wind farm campaigners, including Maurice Newman, a senior business advisor to Abbott.

2 thoughts on “NHMRC $3.3 million on wind farm research – “money down the drain”?”

  1. This is extremely frustrating. What next – $3.3 million to investigate homeopathy? There is not a shred of evidence to support the claims that wind farms damage health, or that homeopathy has any efficacy. If a small minority of people (whether or not it includes the prime minister) holds views based on no empirical evidence whatever, why should public money be spent on investigating them?

    “NHMRC supports only the most outstanding research. Each application for this funding underwent the same stringent independent review process we apply to all NHMRC grant applications.”

    Each applicant for what funding? Does this mean that funds were allocated to investigate wind farms before any applications were received?

    “NHMRC CEO Prof Anne Kelso said that further research was needed to explore the relationships between wind farms and human health.”

    What relationships is she talking about? How has she become convinced that there is a relationship between wind farms and human health?

    This is a purely political exercise funded by the taxpayer. I confidently predict that the outcome of these projects will be a statement to the effect that, whilst no detrimental effects of wind farms have been conclusively demonstrated to date, possible long-term effects cannot be ruled out and further monitoring of the situation will be required over the next 20-30 years. More millions will be spent on pursuing this fiction, and more research empires will be shored up by taxpayers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please make sure to read our comments policy before contributing.